If ?The Hunger Games? gets made into four movies, how should they divide it up?
Ka-thunk!
In most of these other cases, the split makes some degree of sense, and I even thought that the latest Harry Potter actually benefited from some extra breathing room. But the question is whether it?s even possible to scare up a bonus movie from Collins? relatively short books without totally disrupting the flow of the narrative. To get all Biblical on you guys, will it be a fishes-and-loaves scenario or a Solomon?s baby? And where would you even begin to draw the dividing line?
EW?s Karen Valby suggests it could go right after SPOILER ALERT the shocking announcement of the Quarter Quell. I agree that would definitely make a slam-bang cliffhanger, but it would also make the series? second movie pretty uneventful. Little action, no climax, just lots of waving on the Victory Tour, and, crucially, no Hunger Games. That?s a pretty big risk to take after only one movie. For my part, I?m guessing Lionsgate will probably aim to expand the story of the rebellion against the Capitol and choose to chop up Mockingjay, which has action scenes to spare. That will give them enough time to see how the earlier films do box office-wise, and will also follow in the tradition of splitting up the final entry.
If this potential golden goose must be sliced apart to get at all that wonderful treasure inside, where do you think the cut should be made?
Read more:
Lionsgate may make four movies out of ?The Hunger Games trilogy
?Hunger Games? Central
?Hunger Games?: Meet the Cast!
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ew/popwatch/~3/fd_MQKsaJQo/
Jessica White Poppy Montgomery Christina Milian Carrie Underwood Sarah Polley
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home